By Olga Isolina
I am an old lady. A seriously old lady. I did come up through the 60s so mini skirts and free love are part of the lore of that time even though the closest I got to that stuff was listening to pop music. I don’t always love pop music, but sometimes a song just gets it. Despacito is one of those songs and I want to talk a little bit about what might be called the Despacito school of sexual relationships.
You don’t need to know the details of my sexual history, and I don’t need to know the details of yours to be pretty sure that we share an experience. When you first have sex with someone it is likely that neither partner had the slightest idea of how the encounter should go or, for that matter, how it should have gone.
The “talk” most of us receive about sex did nothing to help us navigate those experiences. As I remember the talk —- and in my case my parents simply handed me a book that had been written by my pediatrician —— it was more about anatomy than sex. It would be akin to trying to prepare for a gourmet meal by describing the workings of the digestive system — a non-starter. In the case of sex, the talk is worse than a non-starter. It is a distraction from what I think sex needs to be about.
It would not have helped had my parents simply included a copy of the Kama Sutra along with the pediatrician’s book. If you have ever looked at some of the stuff in there you have to wonder who in the hell ever got out of some of the positions described without a crane. That manual is as useful as handing a couch potato a training manual for people who have completed six marathons and one iron man. Worse, most of the stuff in there needs to be seen as prelude if it is anything at all.
There seem to be only two approaches to sex…both about the body. The first is the “parts” show. What part does what where. The second is the “sensations” show. How to hold those parts (and the other parts that are attached) to get different sensations. All of this really should be a small aspect of something we do not spend much time talking about: sex as language development. We never seem to get to that.
Sex needs to be widely seen as what I think it really is about —- a mechanism for developing a full language of complete trust. This is the real “body language.” It isn’t about conquest. It is not about orgasms (but that helps). It is the event in the world that allows two human beings to create a language between them that carries over to the rest of their dealings with each other. That is why repeated one night stands sells sex short. It is why prostitution really is damaging to the prostitute. It is why sex and commitment is even a thing. It is why after 50 years of marriage my husband and I are not bored out of our minds.
It is also why infidelity is a problem. If sex is the event that helps you develop a private language with all that implies about closeness and exclusiveness, then having sex with another person is a statement concerning what you think about what you have. In fact I think that infidelity is about anger and not about the need for better physical sensation at all. Generally two people can find something to do that works well for each other: that is what your private sexual discussion allows you to do. When we can’t it is rarely because there isn’t stuff to do, it is more likely that the partners have fallen out of the desire to find that out for other reasons. It might also be that the partners are too far apart in their world views to sustain communication at any level. Partners can get over infidelity, but only if they can excise the cause of the anger at its root. If the cause was differences so basic that it impeded communications at every level, then a realistic assessment about the likelihood of changing that needs to happen — no fault attached.
I think we want to get to #notmeUS. While it might be that, in the future, we can simply go there, right now we have to get from where we are (me, me too) to us. I think a place to start would be to begin by adopting the sexual relationship worldview described in the song Despacito. That song makes me blush purple even at my age. It is about as explicit as it can be without being consigned to the dark web, but with a viewpoint that makes me grin like a Cheshire Cat right after I blush. It describes what each partner in the relationship needs to be thinking as they go about developing their special private language. It is usually sung by a man, but it could just as well be sung by a woman. In my thinking, the Despacito school of sexual relations would be best understood if partners to a sexual encounter would sing it as a duet. It asks the sexual question “can I find the things to do that will make this wonderful for you.” That means, of course, that not everything I try will work to do that. We can try stuff and I can even encourage you to try stuff, but if it doesn’t work for you then it doesn’t work for me.
A bad sexual experience is one where there is no conversation going on between two people. Each has a soliloquy that is being played out on the sexual stage. If you imagine how that would work in a theater you can see why it would not work in bed either. If partners are not listening to each other, then the private language cannot develop. If one partner encourages another to try something but when they do, it is not something they like, then if they do not move on to try something else, that is bad sex.
Moving on, however, means that you need to have more than one encounter to get that done. It also means that if you engaged in a trial in a single encounter that was not fun, it is not necessarily a sign of disrespect unless there was coercion. It might just be the soliloquy thing. If we have been fed a particular page of the Kama Sutra that tells you what works generally and we sing it like a gospel song in bed, then we are liable to get it as wrong as we would if we tried to make clothing for a family of 2.3 people. The whole thing about the Despacito school of sexual encounters is that sex needs to be about developing a vocabulary and syntax that works between two bodies, minds and souls.
Sex is always about us.

